Last updated July 9, 2024
This Practice Advisory is provided to specifically address settings in which human Rho(D) immune globulin (RhIg) shortages are present. This Practice Advisory was developed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists with the assistance of Manisha Gandhi, MD, and Andrea Shields, MD, MS.
(Reaffirmed March 2025)
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP), and Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies are reporting Rho(D) immune globulin (RhIg) shortages 1 2 3 .
There are currently four licensed sources of RhIg in the United States 1 :
-
HyperRHO—manufactured by Grifols Therapeutics LLC
-
RhoGAM—manufactured by Kedrion Biopharma Inc.
-
Rhophylac—manufactured by CSL Behring AG
-
WinRho—manufactured by Kamada Ltd.
If a preferred brand of RhIg is not available, an equivalent product may be substituted 2 4 . Information posted on the FDA’s CBER-Regulated Products: Current Shortages webpage is updated as new information becomes available from the manufacturer 1 . In the event of a shortage, consider contacting the various manufacturers to determine the availability of a substitute.
If it becomes necessary to triage the administration of RhIg in locations where shortages persist despite attempts to secure the product from the four manufacturers, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) offers the following prioritization and conservation strategies for consideration:
-
Confirm neonatal Rh(D) status from umbilical cord blood before administering routine postpartum RhIg 5 .
-
Avoid administering RhIg in Rh(D)-sensitized patients 5 .
-
If paternity is certain and the father or sperm donor is known to be Rh(D)-negative, antenatal prophylaxis is unnecessary 5 .
-
Although current ACOG guidance does not recommend routine use of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to determine fetal Rh(D) status based on cost-effectiveness analyses 5 , the use of NIPT to prioritize use of RhIg and conserve RhIg supply is a reasonable consideration in the practice setting that is experiencing RhIg shortages. Noninvasive fetal red blood cell antigen genotyping utilizing cell-free DNA (cfDNA) isolated from maternal plasma has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for detection of fetal Rh(D) antigen status 6 7 8 9 10 . If cfDNA testing results confirm an Rh(D)-negative fetus, RhIg would not need to be routinely administered in the antepartum period (for bleeding, abortion, pregnancy loss, or at 28 weeks of gestation). Available cfDNA testing options for Rh(D) may vary depending on location and practice setting (eg, companies offering the test; whether the test is offered as a stand-alone or combined with aneuploidy testing; timing of results; insurance coverage) and should be confirmed before implementation.
-
For routine RhIg prophylaxis, prioritize postpartum patients (if indicated). If additional supply is available, continue to administer the 28-week antepartum dose as well. This approach has been used in the past and shows a reduction in alloimmunization while maximizing conservation of available RhIg 11 .
-
Other indications for RhIg prophylaxis are discussed in Practice Bulletin No. 181, Prevention of Rh D Alloimmunization 5 . Prioritization of these in a shortage will depend on specifics at a local level (eg, available supply, demand, and predicted length of shortage), but in general, priority may be given to patients at later gestational durations.
As RhIg shortages continue, disparities will become more pronounced. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists continues to recommend RhIg for indications as noted in existing guidance 5 12 13 14 in situations without shortages.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists will continue to actively monitor the situation and update this Practice Advisory with additional information as needed. For more information on RhIg prophylaxis, see the following ACOG guidance documents:
Please contact [email protected] with any questions.
References
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. CBER-regulated products: current shortages. FDA; 2024. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics/cber-regulated-products-current-shortages. Accessed April 23, 2024.
Article Locations:
- American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Rho(D) immune globulin (human). ASHP; 2024. Available at: https://www.ashp.org/drug-shortages/current-shortages/drug-shortage-detail.aspx?id=1022 . Accessed April 23, 2024.
Article Locations:
- Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies. Regulatory update: FDA announces shortages of Rho(D) immune globulin. AABB; 2024. Available at: https://www.aabb.org/news-resources/news/article/2024/02/14/regulatory-update--fda-announces-shortages-of-rho(d)-immune-globulin. Accessed April 23, 2024.
Article Locations:
- Yoham AL and Casadesus D. Rho(D) immune globulin. May 22, 2023. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557884/. Accessed April 23, 2024.
Article Locations:
- Prevention of Rh D alloimmunization. Practice Bulletin No. 181. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:e57-70. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002232
Article Locations:
- Alford B, Landry BP, Hou S, Bower X, Bueno AM, Chen D, et al. Validation of a non-invasive prenatal test for fetal RhD, C, c, E, K and Fy(a) antigens. Sci Rep 2023;13:12786-3. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39283-3
Article Locations:
- Alshehri AA, Jackson DE. Non-invasive prenatal fetal blood group genotype and its application in the management of hemolytic disease of fetus and newborn: systematic review and meta-analysis. Transfus Med Rev 2021;35:85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.02.001
Article Locations:
- Manfroi S, Calisesi C, Fagiani P, Gabriele A, Lodi G, Nucci S, et al. Prenatal non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping: diagnostic accuracy of a test as a guide for appropriate administration of antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis. Blood Transfus 2018;16:514-24. doi: 10.2450/2018.0270-17
Article Locations:
- Saramago P, Yang H, Llewellyn A, Walker R, Harden M, Palmer S, et al. High-throughput non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal rhesus D status in RhD-negative women not known to be sensitised to the RhD antigen: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2018;22:1-172. doi: 10.3310/hta22130
Article Locations:
- Yang H, Llewellyn A, Walker R, Harden M, Saramago P, Griffin S, et al. High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal rhesus D status in RhD-negative women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2019;17:37-4. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1254-4
Article Locations:
- Crowther CA, Middleton P. Anti‐D administration after childbirth for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1997, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD000021. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000021
Article Locations:
- Management of alloimmunization during pregnancy. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 192. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2018;131:e82-90. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002528
Article Locations:
- Early pregnancy loss. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 200. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2018;132:e197-207. doi: 10.1097/AOG.00000000000028999
Article Locations:
- Medication abortion up to 70 days of gestation. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 225. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2020;136:e31-47. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004082
Article Locations:
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recognizes and supports the gender diversity of all patients who seek obstetric and gynecologic care. In original portions of this document, authors seek to use gender-inclusive language or gender-neutral language. When describing research findings, this document uses gender terminology reported by investigators. To review ACOG’s policy on inclusive language, see https://www.acog.org/clinical-information/policy-and-position-statements/statements-of-policy/2022/inclusive-language.
A Practice Advisory is a brief, focused statement issued to communicate a change in ACOG guidance or information on an emergent clinical issue (eg, clinical study, scientific report, draft regulation). A Practice Advisory constitutes ACOG clinical guidance and is issued only online for Fellows but may also be used by patients and the media. Practice Advisories are reviewed periodically for reaffirmation, revision, withdrawal or incorporation into other ACOG guidelines. This information is designed as an educational resource to aid clinicians in providing obstetric and gynecologic care, and use of this information is voluntary. This information should not be considered as inclusive of all proper treatments or methods of care or as a statement of the standard of care. It is not intended to substitute for the independent professional judgment of the treating clinician. Variations in practice may be warranted when, in the reasonable judgment of the treating clinician, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources, or advances in knowledge or technology. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists reviews its publications regularly; however, its publications may not reflect the most recent evidence. Any updates to this document can be found on www.acog.org/clinical.
While ACOG makes every effort to present accurate and reliable information, this publication is provided “as is” without any warranty of accuracy, reliability, or otherwise, either express or implied. ACOG does not guarantee, warrant, or endorse the products or services of any firm, organization, or person. Neither ACOG nor its officers, directors, members, employees, or agents will be liable for any loss, damage, or claim with respect to any liabilities, including direct, special, indirect, or consequential damages, incurred in connection with this publication or reliance on the information presented.
Publications of the American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists are protected by copyright and all rights are reserved. The College’s publications may not be reproduced in any form or by any means without written permission from the copyright owner.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) is the nation’s leading group of physicians providing evidence-based obstetric and gynecologic care. As a private, voluntary, nonprofit membership organization of more than 60,000 members, ACOG strongly advocates for equitable, exceptional, and respectful care for all women and people in need of obstetric and gynecologic care; maintains the highest standards of clinical practice and continuing education of its members; promotes patient education; and increases awareness among its members and the public of the changing issues facing patients and their families and communities. www.acog.org