ACOG Menu

Infertility: Disparities and Access to Services

  • Committee Statement CS
  • Number 14
  • January 2025

Number 14

This Committee Statement was developed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Advancing Equity in Obstetric and Gynecologic Health in collaboration with Torie Comeaux Plowden, MD, MPH, Natalie Whaley, MD, MPH, and Alicia Christy, MD, MHSCR.


ABSTRACT: Diagnostic testing and treatment for infertility should be available to everyone in need of these services. The disparities in rates of infertility and the barriers to accessing assisted reproductive technology services should be understood through and addressed within a reproductive justice framework. Obstetrician–gynecologists and other health care professionals should identify specific populations at risk and their accompanying barriers to access to help improve infertility care across populations. Health care professionals should ask appropriate questions about social and structural drivers of health that may influence a patient’s health and use of the health care system to better understand their patients’ needs and lived experiences. Obstetrician–gynecologists and other health care professionals should advocate for insurance coverage for infertility services, including assisted reproductive technology; policy changes that promote comprehensive reproductive health; and evidence-based, lower cost treatment options.


Recommendations and Conclusions

Based on the principles outlined in this Committee Statement, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) makes the following recommendations and conclusions regarding infertility in historically and intentionally excluded communities:

  • Patients with infertility have a medical disease (not a “social condition”), and health care professionals should provide medically and ethically sound care specific to the etiology of a patient’s diagnosis.

  • Obstetrician–gynecologists should ask all patients about reproductive planning and attempts at pregnancy.

  • Obstetrician–gynecologists and other health care professionals should understand the circumstances in which immediate referrals to subspecialists in reproductive endocrinology and infertility are necessary.

  • Obstetrician–gynecologists and other health care professionals should identify specific populations at risk and their accompanying barriers to access to help improve infertility care across populations.

  • Obstetrician–gynecologists and other health care professionals should recognize that social determinants of health greatly influence access to care and should strive to identify and mitigate self-bias and systemic barriers to equity in access and care.

  • Obstetrician–gynecologists and other health care professionals should collaborate with local and national agencies to provide support for individuals diagnosed with infertility.

  • Obstetrician–gynecologists and other health care professionals should advocate for insurance coverage for infertility services, including assisted reproductive technology, policy changes that promote comprehensive reproductive health, and evidence-based lower cost treatment options.

  • Obstetrician–gynecologists and other health care professionals should intentionally provide patient education about fertility and infertility.

  • Continued research is needed to identify strategies to improve outcomes for individuals with infertility, especially in communities with barriers to access to infertility services.


Background

Diagnostic testing and treatment for infertility should be available to everyone in need of these services. Yet, many individuals do not have access to this necessary care. Various issues limit access to appropriate treatment, including economic barriers. Only recently has infertility been recognized more universally as a medical condition. As defined by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), infertility is the “result of a disease (an interruption, cessation, or disorder of body functions, systems, or organs) of the male or female reproductive tract which prevents [pregnancy] or the ability to carry a pregnancy to delivery” 2.

Disparities exist not only in access to services, but also in the prevalence of infertility. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that 19% of married women aged 15–49 years with no prior births have infertility (they are not surgically sterile and are unable to achieve pregnancy after 1 year of trying). Approximately 16% of currently married women aged 15–49 years have difficulty achieving pregnancy or carrying a pregnancy to term (impaired fecundity) 3. This statistic does not include the many single women and members of the LGBTQ+ community who will require medical assistance to procreate.

Some studies have shown that individuals in some racial and ethnic groups are more likely to experience infertility. A cross-sectional analysis of women aged 33–44 years found that Black women had twofold increased odds (95% CI, 1.3–3.1) of infertility when compared with White women after adjustment for socioeconomic status, pregnancy intent, and risk factors for infertility 4. Additionally, difficulty paying for services was associated with infertility among Black women but not White women.

Although the literature is limited, Asian American patients are more likely to experience infertility, wait longer to seek infertility treatment, and have lower success rates compared with White women 5. Some data suggest that, although Hispanic women do not have a higher prevalence of infertility, they have lower rates of use of infertility services when compared with non-Hispanic White women, even after an infertility evaluation 6. A study found that American Indian and Alaska Native female respondents had a 1.37 times greater prevalence of infertility and a 1.3 times greater prevalence of impaired fecundity compared with White women 7. For Black, Indigenous, and people of color, the prevalence of infertility often is high; even when it is comparable with the prevalence in White women, the utilization of infertility services is lower 7. The existing disparities in prevalence of disease and access to needed services are further exacerbated by the current climate of accelerated assaults on reproductive rights.

Reproductive justice, a framework created in the 1990s by Black women, highlights the importance of reproductive autonomy, including the right to become pregnant and the right not to be pregnant, as well as the right to parent one’s children in safe communities 9. The disparities in rates of infertility and the barriers to accessing assisted reproductive technology services should be understood through and addressed within a reproductive justice framework.


Recommendations and Conclusions

Patients with infertility have a medical disease (not a “social condition”), and health care professionals should provide medically and ethically sound care specific to the etiology of a patient’s diagnosis.

Infertility is recognized as a medical condition by multiple international and national organizations, including the World Health Organization, the ASRM, and the American Medical Association 2 10 12. People with infertility should be taken seriously by health care professionals, be treated with compassion, receive an appropriate workup, and participate in a discussion about their treatment options.

Obstetrician–gynecologists should ask all patients about reproductive planning and attempts at pregnancy.

Obstetrician–gynecologists have the unique opportunity to guide their patients through decisions across their reproductive lifespans. The “One Key Question Initiative” acknowledges how one simple question can open a conversation of high importance: “ Would you like to become pregnant in the next year?13. This allows an opportunity for a prepregnancy visit and to open a discussion regarding future fertility goals and desires.

Obstetrician–gynecologists and other health care professionals should understand the circumstances in which immediate referrals to subspecialists in reproductive endocrinology and infertility are necessary.

Given that individuals who are trying to become pregnant but have not yet been successful often present to their gynecologist first, it is critically important that obstetrician–gynecologists feel comfortable taking a history, completing a physical examination, and undertaking an infertility workup. Although a patient may be referred to an infertility subspecialist at any time during this process, there are several reasons warranting an immediate referral to a reproductive endocrinologist Box 1.

Box 1.

When an Immediate Referral to a Reproductive Endocrinologist is Warranted

Women older than age 40 years

Patients with the following conditions:

  • Irregular menstrual cycles, cycle length less than 25 d, intermenstrual bleeding, oligomenorrhea, or amenorrhea

  • Known or suspected uterine, tubal, or peritoneal disease or endometriosis

  • Known or suspected male subfertility

  • Sexual dysfunction

  • Genetic or acquired conditions that predispose to diminished ovarian reserve (eg, chemotherapy, radiation exposure, FMR1 premutation)

Data from Fertility evaluation of infertile women: a committee opinion. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertil Steril 2021;116:1255–65. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.08.038

Obstetrician–gynecologists and other health care professionals should identify specific populations at risk and their accompanying barriers to access to help improve infertility care across populations.

Disparities exist in access and treatment outcomes, particularly in Black, Latina, and Native American populations. These disparities extend to other vulnerable groups as well. Health care professionals should be aware of the challenges faced by these specific populations. Members of the LGBTQ+ community and single heterosexual women have been denied treatment in the past, which is against the ASRM’s ethical standards 2 14. Transgender individuals in particular are vulnerable. Due to the potential effects of cross-sex hormone therapy on gonads (particularly on spermatogenesis), all transgender patients should be counseled about fertility preservation before receiving medical treatment 14 15. Individuals with cancer should be offered fertility preservation; depending on their disease status, fertility preservation often may be completed before undergoing gonadotoxic therapy 16. This is of particular importance for adolescents and young people with cancer 17. Additionally, some other diseases (ie, systemic lupus erythematosus and hematologic disorders) also may require treatment with gonadotoxic therapy. Thus, these patients also should be offered fertility preservation 12. Active-duty and reserve uniformed service members and veterans also experience lack of access to care 18. Geographic barriers can impede care, because many infertility clinics are concentrated in urban areas 12. In fact, approximately 18 million reproductive-aged people live in areas without any assisted reproductive technology clinics 19. See Table 1 for a more comprehensive, though not all-inclusive, list of populations at risk for inequities in infertility care.

Infertility: Disparities and Access to Services

Obstetrician–gynecologists and other health care professionals should recognize that social determinants of health greatly influence access to care and should strive to identify and mitigate self-bias and systemic barriers to equity in access and care.

A substantial barrier to addressing inequities in infertility care is the internal biases of health care professionals. This can be manifested by health care professionals making clinical assumptions based on personal bias, inappropriate referral patterns, and a failure to become educated about the subject area. Obstetrician–gynecologists and other health care professionals should recognize that making presumptions about a patient’s cultural beliefs can adversely affect their ability to provide appropriate care 20. Furthermore, health care professionals should ask appropriate questions about social and structural drivers of health that may influence a patient’s health and use of the health care system to better understand their patients’ needs and lived experiences 20.

There is a growing body of literature that indicates that systemic racism directly contributes to health disparities 21. Health care professionals should understand the roles that personally mediated, systemic, and structural racism play in creating and perpetuating adverse health outcomes and health care experiences 22. Biases against other vulnerable groups (eg, nonnative English speakers, individuals who are undocumented, and those from nondominant religious groups) also may contribute to disparities in access. Health care professionals should ensure adequate interpreter services when not communicating with patients in their primary language 20. Disparities in infertility care are magnified further because these same groups are disproportionately affected by social determinants of health 23.

Obstetrician–gynecologists and other health care professionals should collaborate with local and national agencies to provide support for individuals diagnosed with infertility.

A notable number of individuals diagnosed with infertility will experience mental health distress. Several studies have found that 30–40% of women undergoing infertility treatment had depression and anxiety 24 25 26 27. Other studies have noted that women with infertility experience shame, grief, a perceived lack of femininity, and self-blame 28 29. A qualitative study revealed five themes among women with infertility experience: 1) anxiety; 2) mood disturbance; 3) threat to self-esteem, identity, and purpose; 4) deterioration of the couple; and 5) weakened support network 30. Health care professionals should be sensitive to potential emotional and psychological issues related to infertility, prepared to support their patients, and aware of national organizations and support groups that cater to individuals with infertility.

Obstetrician–gynecologists and other health care professionals should advocate for insurance coverage for infertility services, including assisted reproductive technology; policy changes that promote comprehensive reproductive health; and evidence-based, lower cost treatment options.

Economic barriers make infertility treatment inaccessible to many, particularly members of Black, Asian-American, Hispanic, and Indigenous communities. The ASRM notes that fertility treatment is, “…available mainly to non-Hispanic Whites and the economic elite…” and that this inequity perpetuates the idea that treatment is a “lifestyle choice” 12. Insurance coverage for infertility care is very limited in the United States, and fewer than half of states have mandated coverage 12. To improve access to care, robust, comprehensive insurance coverage for fertility treatment must be made widely available and health care professionals should seek evidence-based, lower-cost methods of treatment, including strategies to lower the cost of in vitro fertilization (eg, natural cycle or low stimulation cycles). The 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision continues to threaten reproductive rights beyond just the right to abortion, and the effects on fertility treatment are still unclear. Obstetrician–gynecologists should advocate for policies that support comprehensive reproductive health, including access to infertility services 32. Although literature regarding infertility is more limited, disparities in health literacy and fertility knowledge are associated with sociodemographic factors. Fertility awareness, in general, is low to moderate among reproductive-aged individuals, with more highly educated individuals having greater fertility awareness 33. Data also suggest that individuals from low-resource, largely immigrant communities who are seeking access to fertility services have greater disparities in fertility knowledge and lower health literacy compared with individuals from high-resource backgrounds 34. Identification and recognition of risk factors for lower health literacy can help inform interventions. One example of changes that can be made is with the reading level of patient-education literature. Despite the fact that most adults read at an 8th-grade level, most health care materials are written at a 10th-grade level or higher 35. Patient materials that are written at an appropriate reading level to be easily understood and that are available in a patient’s native language can help decrease disparities in fertility knowledge.

Continued research is needed to identify strategies to improve outcomes for individuals with infertility, especially in communities with barriers to access to infertility services.

Race and ethnicity data often are missing in studies and registries. Thus, it is likely that disparities in infertility care are underreported. A study of SART CORS data, a population-based analysis of in vitro fertilization cycles, found that race and ethnicity was reported in only 51.6% of cycles 36. To understand disparities and address inequities in infertility care, universal and accurate reporting of race and ethnicity must occur in all research.


Conclusion

Reproduction is a basic human right 12. Improving access and eliminating disparate outcomes regardless of race and ethnicity, geographic location, socioeconomic status, martial status, sexual orientation, or gender identity must be the ultimate goal to attain reproductive justice in America.

Use of Language

ACOG recognizes and supports the gender diversity of all patients who seek obstetric and gynecologic care. In original portions of this document, the authors seek to use gender-inclusive language or gender-neutral language. When describing research findings, this document uses gender terminology reported by the investigators. ACOG's policy on inclusive language can be reviewed at https://acog.org/clinical-information/policy-and-position-statements/statements-of-policy/2022/inclusive-language.


Conflict of Interest Statement

All ACOG committee members and authors have submitted a conflict of interest disclosure statement related to this published product. Any potential conflicts have been considered and managed in accordance with ACOG's Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policy. The ACOG policies can be found on acog.org . For products jointly developed with other organizations, conflict of interest disclosures by representatives of the other organizations are addressed by those organizations. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has neither solicited nor accepted any commercial involvement in the development of the content of this published product.


References

  1. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Frequently asked questions about infertility . Accessed August 5, 2024. https://www.reproductivefacts.org/browse-resources/frequently-asked-questions/faq-about-infertility/
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  2. Definition of infertility: a committee opinion. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertil Steril 2023; 120: 1170. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(23)01971-4
    Article Locations:
    Article LocationArticle LocationArticle Location
  3. National Center for Health Statistics. Infertility. In: Key statistics from the National Survey of Family Growth . Accessed September 5, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/i-keystat.htm#infertility
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  4. Wellons MF, Lewis CE, Schwartz SM, Gunderson EP, Schreiner PJ, Sternfeld B, et al. Racial differences in self-reported infertility and risk factors for infertility in a cohort of Black and White women: the CARDIA Women's Study. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 1640– 8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.056
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  5. Vu MH, Nguyen AA, Alur-Gupta S. Asian Americans and infertility: genetic susceptibilities, sociocultural stigma, and access to care. F S Rep 2021; 3: 40– 5. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.12.004
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  6. Komorowski AS, Jain T. A review of disparities in access to infertility care and treatment outcomes among Hispanic women. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2022; 20: 1. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00875-1
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  7. Craig LB, Peck JD, Janitz AE. The prevalence of infertility in American Indian/Alaska Natives and other racial/ethnic groups: National Survey of Family Growth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2019; 33: 119– 25. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12538
    Article Locations:
    Article LocationArticle Location
  8. SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Health Collective. Understanding reproductive justice . Accessed August 5, 2024. https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/rrfp/pages/33/attachments/original/1456425809/Understanding_RJ_Sistersong.pdf
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  9. Perritt J, Eugene N. Inequity and injustice: recognizing infertility as a reproductive justice issue. F S Rep 2021; 3: 2- 4. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.08.007
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  10. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson G, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 1520– 4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  11. Berg S. AMA backs global health experts in calling infertility a disease . Accessed August 5, 2024. https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/public-health/ama-backs-global-health-experts-calling-infertility-disease
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  12. Disparities in access to effective treatment for infertility in the United States: an ethics committee opinion. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertil Steril 2021; 116: 54– 63. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.019
    Article Locations:
    Article LocationArticle LocationArticle LocationArticle LocationArticle LocationArticle Location
  13. Prepregnancy counseling. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 762. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133: e78– 89. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003013
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  14. Access to fertility services by transgender and nonbinary persons: an ethics committee opinion. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertil Steril 2021; 115: 874– 8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.01.049
    Article Locations:
    Article LocationArticle Location
  15. Schwartz AR, Moravek MB. Insufficient fertility counseling and decisional regret: a call to raise our standards for fertility preservation counseling prior to gender-affirming care. Fertil Steril 2021; 115: 901– 2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.01.053
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  16. Fertility preservation and reproduction in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies: a committee opinion. Ethics Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertil Steril 2013; 100: 1224– 31. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.08.041
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  17. Gynecologic issues in children and adolescent cancer patients and survivors. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 747. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132: e67– 77. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002763
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  18. Pilgrim J, Healy M, Yauger BJ, Torrealday S, Csokmay J, Hill M. Assisted reproductive technology and the reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialist in the U.S. military. Semin Reprod Med 2018; 36: 323– 6. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1681084
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  19. Harris JA, Menke MN, Haefner JK, Moniz MH, Perumalswami CR. Geographic access to assisted reproductive technology health care in the United States: a population-based cross-sectional study. Fertil Steril 2017; 107: 1023– 7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.02.101
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  20. Addressing social and structural determinants of health in the delivery of reproductive health care. Committee statement no. 11. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2024; 144: e113– 20. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005721
    Article Locations:
    Article LocationArticle LocationArticle Location
  21. Bailey ZD, Krieger N, Agénor M, Graves J, Linos N, Bassett MT. Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions. Lancet 2017; 389: 1453– 63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30569-X
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  22. Racial and ethnic inequities in obstetrics and gynecology. Committee Statement No. 10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2024; 144: e62– 74. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005678
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  23. Wellons MF, Fujimoto VY, Baker VL, Barrington DS, Broomfield D, Catherino WH, et al. Race matters: a systematic review of racial/ethnic disparity in Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology reported outcomes. Fertil Steril 2012; 98: 406– 9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.012
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  24. Chen T, Chang S, Tsai C, Juang K. Prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders in an assisted reproductive technique clinic [published erratum appears in Hum Reprod 2004;19:2968]. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 2313– 8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh414
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  25. Kee BS, Jung BJ, Lee SH. A study on psychological strain in IVF patients. J Assist Reprod Genet 2000; 17: 445– 8. doi: 10.1023/a:1009417302758
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  26. Nelson CJ, Shindel AW, Naughton CK, Ohebshalom M, Mulhall JP. Prevalence and predictors of sexual problems, relationship stress, and depression in female partners of infertile couples. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 1907– 14. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00880.x
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  27. Volgsten H, Skoog Svanberg A, Ekselius L, Lundkvist O, Sundström Poromaa I. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in infertile women and men undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 2056– 63. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den154
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  28. Benyamini Y, Gozlan M, Kokia E. Women's and men's perceptions of infertility and their associations with psychological adjustment: a dyadic approach. Br J Health Psychol 2009; 14: 1– 16. doi: 10.1348/135910708X279288
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  29. Oddens BJ, den Tonkelaar I, Nieuwenhuyse H. Psychosocial experiences in women facing fertility problems—a comparative survey. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 255– 61. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.1.255
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  30. Dube L, Nkosi-Mafutha N, Balsom AA, Gordon JL. Infertility-related distress and clinical targets for psychotherapy: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2021; 11: e050373. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050373
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  31. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Legislative interference with patient care, medical decisions, and the patient-physician relationship. Statement of Policy . Accessed August 5, 2024. https://www.acog.org/clinical-information/policy-and-position-statements/statements-of-policy/2019/legislative-interference-with-patient-care-medical-decisions-and-the-patient-physician-relationship
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  32. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 97– 107. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  33. Pedro J, Brandão T, Schmidt L, Costa ME, Martins MV. What do people know about fertility? A systematic review on fertility awareness and its associated factors. Ups J Med Sci 2018; 123: 71– 81. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2018.1480186
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  34. Hoffman JR, Delaney MA, Valdes CT, Herrera D, Washington SL, Aghajanova L, et al. Disparities in fertility knowledge among women from low and high resource settings presenting for fertility care in two United States metropolitan centers. Fertil Res Pract 2020; 6: 15. doi: 10.1186/s40738-020-00084-1
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  35. Safeer RS, Keenan J. Health literacy: the gap between physicians and patients. Am Fam Physician 2005; 72: 463– 8.
    Article Locations:
    Article Location
  36. Seifer DB, Frazier LM, Grainger DA. Disparity in assisted reproductive technologies outcomes in Black women compared with White women. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 1701– 10. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.024
    Article Locations:
    Article Location

Published online December 12, 2024

Copyright 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, posted on the internet, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
409 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20024-2188

Infertility: disparities and access to services. Committee Statement No. 14. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2025;145:e51–e57.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) reviews its publications regularly; however, its publications may not reflect the most recent evidence. A reaffirmation date is included in the online version of a document to indicate when it was last reviewed. The current status and any updates of this document can be found on ACOG Clinical at acog.org/lot .

This information is designed as an educational resource to aid clinicians in providing obstetric and gynecologic care, and use of this information is voluntary. This information should not be considered as inclusive of all proper treatments or methods of care or as a statement of the standard of care. It is not intended to substitute for the independent professional judgment of the treating clinician. Variations in practice may be warranted when, in the reasonable judgment of the treating clinician, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources, or advances in knowledge or technology.

While ACOG makes every effort to present accurate and reliable information, this publication is provided “as is” without any warranty of accuracy, reliability, or otherwise, either express or implied. ACOG does not guarantee, warrant, or endorse the products or services of any firm, organization, or person. Neither ACOG nor its officers, directors, members, employees, or agents will be liable for any loss, damage, or claim with respect to any liabilities, including direct, special, indirect, or consequential damages, incurred in connection with this publication or reliance on the information presented.